1. The author's claim is that binge drinking among youths has clearly and undisputably decreased over the years from 1980-2003 by roughly 1/3, yet with the media highlighting and exagurating specific events, it gives the false impression that binge drinking is on the rise, and causes easily influenced youth to believe that their peers often drink and so must they in order to conform.
2. The author's support for his claim is as follows: attacking the credibility of the media, student and world-wide surveys, examples of "binge drinking" in other countries, and statistisical evidence related to the above.
3. The author has a number of assumptions and underlying beliefs about this issue and broader related issues. It is quite obvious that the author is somewhat dissatisfied with media reports exaggurating the so called "binge drinking epidemic." He also believes that youth should be free to make their own decisions and not be persuaded by false media impressions. He believes that education and committment to academics and well being is important, especially for youth, and states that the underlying problem is media misrepresentation and false impressions aimed towards average or non-drinkers.
4. I believe that argument is overwhelmingly effective. It assesses both sides to some extent, but provides complete and comprehensive statistical evidence and surveys to paint a picture that binge drinking is in fact on the decline, and that media exemplification is causing youth to go into highschool and college with the impression that their peers are all drinkers. He provides an immediate solution to help correct that problem, that being to present all the facts truthfully.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
New Things I Learned From Editorial
My editorial was based on the prospect of nuclear power as an alternative source of energy from an objective standpoint from an LA Times writer. I had previously thought that nuclear energy was a major altnerative to our limited supply of fossil fuels. However, this write made very strong points against nuclear energy. I learned about many of the risk factors of nuclear energy, and the major problem that I was already somewhat aware of: what to do with the radioactive waste from nuclear fission that remains toxic for thousands of years. Perhaps most importantly in the short-term is the cost, like so many other modern energy alternatives. It would cost far too much and take far to long to update the nuclear power grid to make any significant changes in global warming or our need for energy. I will definitelty investigate this issue further.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Research Paper - Assignment 1 - Topic Information
The controversial topic that I have chosen for my semseter research paper is 'Alternative Energy.' I know that as a country, and the entire world for that matter, depend on energy to run our economies. As our population increases and various countries become more industrialized, our dependence is growing. Unfortunately, our conventional sources of energy, fossil fuels to name one, are not growing with this dependence, rather they are disapearing rapidly. Thus, we as an international community must committ to finding new sources of energy and incorporating those sources on a large-scale economically viable infrastructure.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)